The Impossible Question

“Once upon a time, I, Chuang Tzu, dreamed I was a butterfly, fluttering hither and thither, to all intents and purposes a butterfly, and was unconscious of my individuality as a man. Suddenly I awoke, and there I lay, myself again. Now I do not know whether I was then a man dreaming I was a butterfly, or whether I am now a butterfly dreaming I am a man.”



Philosophical Advise Needed

If I say there exists an inside (i);

I am also saying there exists and outside (o).

I could then come up with a third category – a boarder one:

The set that contains o and i.

The definition of inside is: “the inner side of a thing.”
So, let us presume that the broader category including i and o is called t (things).

But, we have produced a useless statement – a trap!

Because, the definition of a thing is “an object that one need not, cannot, or does not wish to give a specific name to.”

The problem is we just gave this overarching class a name: thing; which is nonspecific..
But, I wanted to be specific with my naming, I wanted the name to only include inside and outside.

I wanted the entire set to only be comprised of (i,o).

But, what I am neglecting, is the fact the () carries some significance to it.

I don’t have to define it as a ‘thing’ because the moment I put () around i,o…it becomes a singular entity.
What I am highlighting is a predicated relationship:

An outside is defined as “the external side of something,” while an inside is: “the inner side of a thing.”
The common factor being a ‘thing’.

My point being is this:

The definition of inside is predicated by an outside and and vice versa;

Furthermore, they also share the existence of a ‘thing’.

But, this ‘thing’ must be nonspecific, but my use runs contrary to its definition;

I want the set to only include inside and outside.


these become my questions:

what would be the above (overarching) class of a inside/outside?

Even if the overarching set could be categorized by a word, would it not be a tautology?

If anything ever takes upon the existence of all, can ‘all’ not only be defined by the parts that make up all?

Chinese & The Dollar Collapse

On October 1, 2016, the Chinese Yuan will become a world reserve currency alongside the “U.S. dollar, yen, euro, the British pound and the Swiss franc.” It will account for 10.92% of IMF total reserve currency.

The Chinese have been planning  to become the world’s best economy for some time and this is the next step and a big one. They currently are the second largest world economy to the United States (of course). But they are doing many things including becoming an international reserve currency and establishing the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which opened in January of this year.


An Isolated Human

There is nobody now –
just me.
All I know for certain is that my death awaits me.
But in what timespan – the answer remains unknown.
In fact, he had lost entire track of time himself.
Suns’ rose and Suns’ set.
Moons’ waxed and wanned –
even briefly fleeing the night’s plane.
At first, I thought to count the cycles,
but then I figured,
what was the point:
there was nothing alive to share it with –
nor would there ever be again.

The ‘Great’ Society

I feel powerless against the current. The society and culture I live is suffocating – but it appears to be only suffocating me. Others, appear to be gorging themselves in the material surplus and our gradual decline towards replacing reality with a virtual one.

I hear a few other voices out there preaching words that resonant with me. But their reach seems to reach few; and they too are mocked for being crazy or conspiratorial.
But what if it’s true:
The best kind of marketing is that which you don’t feel is marketing.
The best kind of tyranny is the tyranny that doesn’t feel like tyranny.
It may seem contradictory but what is a tyrant?
One that rules absolutely…sometimes through oppressive means.
But what are oppressive means?
When we think of oppression, we think of physical violence, but can’t you also be psychological oppressed?
It’s weird that we live in an age where information is abundant. But discovering something that you can be confident is true is truly hard, while wisdom seems to be something reserved for those crazy hippies and the Dalai Lama.
I guess I’m just ranting again, but I’m just afraid. I’m afraid that the farther I branch out from the norm or status quo, the more I’ll reject that lifestyle…that may already be happening. I guess, moreover, I’m afraid that when it comes down to it, I reject that way of life – but I presume they would reject mine as well. And they are the majority; and I, the lowly withering minority.
I just don’t want it to wither until it is only my voice and my mind that sees these trends. Because then I’ll surely be labeled as crazy and locked up and the game will be complete:
No free will for any players but complete feelings of autonomy.